Author: Mitchell A. Sobieski

From White Hoods to Red Hats: How MAGA revives the ideological legacy of the Klan in Trump’s America

In the years since Donald Trump ascended to the forefront of American politics, the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement has transformed into a potent cultural and political force. Beneath its veneer of patriotism and populist rhetoric lies a troubling truth: the MAGA movement is at its core the ideological and rhetorical heir to the Ku Klux Klan (KKK). While the MAGA movement lacks the overt violence and explicit racial terror of the Klan, its methods, symbolism, and goals echo a chillingly familiar story of White Supremacy rebranded for the modern era. The comparison is not hyperbolic, it is...

Read More

Crime and Profit: When Trump’s felonies encourage criminal behavior as a path to success

In the United States, few labels carry as much lasting baggage as being a “felon.” For decades, a felony conviction all but guaranteed a barren job search, piles of rejection letters, and skeptical glances from prospective employers. The stigma attached to a criminal record has been reinforced by the long-running “War on Crime” political history championed by Republican lawmakers who portrayed themselves as the hard-nosed protectors of law and order. Yet the once bedrock principle has collided with the political storm that is Donald Trump. Now that Trump himself has been labeled a convicted felon, has the old rule...

Read More

The 24-hour lie: Trump’s political impotence persists after failing to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

It has been more than 48 hours since convicted felon Donald J. Trump took the oath of office for his second presidential term on January 20. To nobody’s surprise, except his most delusional loyalists, the war in Ukraine was not brought to an end in his first 24 hours occupying the White House. Trump had boasted repeatedly on the campaign trail that he could end the conflict within 24 hours of assuming the presidency. One of his most widely circulated quotes from last year was: “If I were president, the war between Russia and Ukraine would end in 24...

Read More

A house on fire: When voters refuse to equate their actions to the suffering their choices created

The 2024 U.S. presidential election solidified a disturbing trend in American politics, a willingness among voters to choose leaders whose policies and track records directly harm their well-being. The phenomenon is not new, but its persistence and increasingly dire consequences require some reflection. How did America arrive here? Why do voters, especially those who stand to lose the most, continue to support candidates whose actions lead to destruction, division, and personal suffering? And what lessons must we learn from this cyclical self-sabotage? 2016: TRUMP’S VICTORY AND THE “ANOMALY” THAT WAS NOT In 2016, Donald Trump’s election was often described...

Read More

The death of Brian Thompson exposed the structural violence of the private health insurance industry

The brazen murder of Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, on a Midtown Manhattan street has rattled the U.S. health care industry. But beyond the tragic shock of an executive’s targeted killing, an unsettling truth now lies exposed with deep and pervasive anger at America’s private insurance system. In the aftermath of Thompson’s death, what began as a crime story rapidly morphed into a larger conversation about insurance-driven structural harm and fury. As thousands took to social media to express bitterness rather than sympathy, America’s long-suppressed frustration with a system that often denies necessary health care, inflates costs, and...

Read More

Scripture as a weapon: How the Confederacy’s biblical justification of oppression still echoes today

The twisted interpretation of Christianity by pro-slavery advocates in the Confederacy is one of the most troubling and insidious chapters in American history. To defend the indefensible institution of slavery, Southern theologians and politicians clung to a highly selective and morally bankrupt reading of the Bible. They sought to justify the oppression and dehumanization of millions of Black people by distorting the core message of the Christian faith. By doing so, they ignored the Bible’s call for justice, equality, and liberation, the values of salvation that are incompatible with the existence of slavery. The use of scripture to support...

Read More